GARMIN 010-00679-15 Forerunner 50 With Foot Pod


The Forerunner 50 rocks!4

After reading about Polar's new running watch I almost bought it but after a couple of negative reviews I decided to check out the market first. I happened to see an ad for the Garmin Forerunner in a runnning mag and thought I would take a closer look at it. I ended up buying it (with the foot pod only not the heart rate monitor as I already have one and don't use it much) and I am extremely pleased!



Pros: The watch is very accurate from what I can tell (admittedly a nonscientific approach) and what a lot of fun! The wonk in me marvels at how a watch can tell you exactly how far you have run your current pace your average pace and calories burned. It is lightweight with an easy to read face and you forget about the foot pod once you clip it into your shoes. It's a fantastically motivating tool ... my only concern is that I will fall on my face as I am constantly checking my progress while I run! Technology nerds will enjoy being able to complete their run immediately check out their history and then once at home download the data onto their PCs. Also the price is very reasonable (although I bought mine with foot pod for $139 just last week and now I see the price has jumped to $169).



Cons: The watch face and strap are really large and obviously made for a man. I'm small wristed even for a woman and have to use the smallest hole to buckle the watch. On the other hand the size of the watch face is probably what makes it possible to see all the data so clearly while running. My other gripe is the owner's manual which appears to be written in English by someone who is not native to the language. Fortunately it is pretty easy to figure out. My first couple of runs weren't recorded because I didn't completely understand how to start/stop/save a run but after I got the hang of it it was a breeze.More detail ...

GARMIN 010-10446-00 Handlebar Mounting Bracket


Do you take your running seriously?5

I have recently purchased a Forerunner 301 after having used a Sports Instruments heart rate monitor for about a year. The heart rate monitor was excellent and certainly usefull in the gym - rather than wait a certain length of time between sets wait until your HR is below 120bpm. It allows you to pace yourself much more.

When it comes to running it is difficult to measure your performance (time heart rate and distance) over the days and weeks. A heart rate monitor is good but when training you need to push yourself and will always have a high heart rate.



The forerunner is a completely different animal. So different that there really isn't any fair comparison at all.

With this puppy on your arm you can build a workout (they are quite simple but effective) on your pc slap it on the forerunner and off you go. Great running feedback and excellent info when transferred to the pc. Everything is easy to do - not quite WinXP wizard easy but simple none the less.



If you live in a large city forrested areas or anywhere with sky obstructions then it may give your trouble with reception. I have had a gps for years and with my wifi experience I knew that reliable reception was going to be an issue. However for me I found the reception excellent. Great in fact! In my lounge I can still get a lock with 4 good strength sattelites! If I stop it reacts within 1 second and another second it knows I have stopped (due to the 1 second display update speed). Much better gps calculations than my garmin gps12.



If you are gagety inclined and ARE taking (not just wanting or planning to) your running or biking seriously then without a doubt this is the machine for you.



It isn't too big but big enough to read. Locks on in less than 1 minute in my small back yard and has stellar reaction time. Perhaps even just keeping track of your exercise history is worth it for you? Or the in running feedback? Or the calorie (much more realistic than anythng else I have seen) info?



I am very happy with my buy. I paid $230 for it. Worth every last buck. From my experience I have no trouble recommending the Forerunner 301 to any one who is taking their running seriously!!

More detail ...

Garmin Forerunner 101 Runners Pack


Garmin 1014

I am training for a marathon and I needed a device to help me measure the distance I have run. I wanted something plain and simple without too many beeps and whistles. The Garmin 101 is perfect and has worked flawlessly. If you are looking for a simple piece of equipment to measure time pace and distance look no further.More detail ...

Garmin A/C Charger for Forerunner 201


It has improved4

The new charger for forerunner 201 has been redesigned to have an input range of 100-240 V. I damaged my original one in Egypt where the current was 240 V and the charger could not handle that. More detail ...

Garmin Charging Cradle for Forerunner 205 and 305


GPS pops out2

I would not buy this product again. It does charge my GPS but I have to put a rubber band around it get it to make contact. More detail ...

GARMIN FORERUNNER 305 REMANUFACTURED 1 YEAR WARRANTY


cant go without it5

As an ironman level triathlete this is an essential training tool that I use everyday. Anyone wanting to have specific information about thier workouts need this device. As far as I can see this is the best unit out there. Once they make it waterproof it will be perfect and that is coming this summer. I prefer it greatly over the other model that looks more like a conventional wristwatch.More detail ...

Garmin FR60 Women's Lilac Fitness Watch (Includes Heart Rate Monitor and USB ANT Stick)


Disappointed3

I had been looking at this sport watch for 6 months and had read the reviews in Runners' World. I felt I had researched well and my husband ended up purchasing this for me for Christmas. I have yet to be able to use the watch while running because it is very difficult to figure out. I have a master's degree and use electronics frequently so one would think I could easily figure this out. I tried several times and my niece also worked on it for a week. No luck. I had one more person to try and he had gotten other runners' watches working. It took him several hours but he did get it working. I have not yet had the time to try it out but I will say that if I still can't get it to work it goes back. All I am interested in right now is my time pace and distance. Another MAJOR complaint is that the owners manual is not packaged with it! There is a quick start guide that was worthless. I did what it said and got nowhere. I spent over $200 for the watch and footpod and then I am expected to print out the owners manual on my printer (40 pages!)? So I hope that once I can use this watch it works and that I have to rewrite this review.More detail ...

Garmin Forerunner 205 Wrist-Mounted GPS Fitness Computer (Bilingual)


Love it!5

I love my Garmin watch. It was brand new in the box just like it was supposed to be. Very happy with all the features on the watch and the service I received from Beach Audio.More detail ...

Garmin 010-00679-05 Forerunner 50 Sports Watch with Heart Rate Monitor and USB ANT Stick


Great for Running5

I already own the Forerunner 305 and love it except for the large size of the watch when I am running. I considered getting the new 405 but since I already owned the foot pod and I actually like the larger unit (read as "larger screen")of the 305 while on the bike I decided to just add to my current system with the Garmin 50. The GPS function of the 305 is nice but while I tend to explore on the road bike I also tend to travel the same routes over and over while running so the GPS functions are not really necessary. The Garmin 50 is super light and perfect for running. Via the ANT stick it will update Garmin Connect (the on-line training record) and Garmin Training Center automatically so they are always synched. The display is small and only displays two pieces of info at on time such as heart rate and distance or distance and pace but I find that's all I usually need and I can check the rest of the info at the end of the workout. I tested the foot pod distance readings against a known distance and the 305's GPS reading and it was accurate out of the box and did not require calibration.



The only problems I have had are that the date that the watch records for workouts is 7 days off and according to Garmin cannot be corrected. The date on the Time Display is correct though so it's still accurate as a watch and the date shows up correctly when you upload the workout to Garmin Training Center. I'm sure they will fix this glitch in the future but it's a minor irritation. This is a great unit. More detail ...

Garmin Forerunner 201


Some flaws for bicycling use4

Overall the Forerunner 201 works well for bicycling although I wouldn't discard my conventional bike computer for several reasons:



1. In Speed mode (vs. Pace mode) there's no option to average out the readings and the unit is too sensitive to motion. With the GPS mounted on a bike and the bike at a complete stop tiny motions of less than 1 cm continuously trigger the autostop/autostart so it keeps beeping and accumulating elapsed time and distance. Setting the Auto Pause threshold to a non-zero value mitigates this problem at a slight risk of false pauses.



2. The % grade (custom) readout is highly erratic. If you're moving too slowly (less than 5 mph) even if you're burning your lungs on a climb it may read 0% or even a negative number like -3%! Seems like there may be a math underflow bug in the algorithm when the vertical displacement is too small over successive readings.



3. The altitude reading is not credible when you don't have a clear view of the sky. The unit seems to extrapolate from the last trend it had to "update" the readout rather than indicating that it's unable to read the altitude. I was on King's Mountain Road (SF Peninsula) under tree-cover came out into an open spot and the altitude reading jumped by over 500 feet when the GPS got an actual reading from the satellites. There are 2 stretches like this on the climb and it happened both times.



Enabling Auto Lap in the Training Assistant mode sets the GPS to record trackpoints (time latitude longitude and altitude) supposedly at fixed distance intervals the finest preset value being 1 mile. At firmware version 3.40 the current track can hold 3000 points with the oldest points being overwritten by the newest when you exceed 3000.



You might think this means you can go 3000 miles without losing any data but it seems to sample more often than at 1 mile intervals. I've found that after about 7 hours I start getting my oldest trackpoints overwritten. The only way around it is to remember to stop the timer reset then start the timer: this starts a new track (the previous track is still in the unit's memory until you clear History).



The Windows-only Forerunner Logbook application downloadable from Garmin's website is able to download tracks and display (a) speed or pace vs. time (b) map of the route (from timer start to timer stop) (c) altitude vs. time. There were some goofy data for my most recent ride which showed me exceeding 80 mph(!) probably caused by gaps when the GPS signal was too weak to register. The Logbook application can also export the data as an XML file where each data sample contains Zulu time latitude longitude and altitude (in meters regardless of your settings on the Forerunner or in Logbook). However the format seems not be recognized by any program (including Forerunner Logbook; i.e. it doesn't know how to read the XML file it wrote!) making it of rather dubious value. Garmin's more recent Training Center (again Windows-only) app does better. GPSBabel (and MacGPSBabel) can now translate LogBook's XML to other formats including HikeTech (see below). With your track data in GPX format you can use FlightTrack (Mac OS X) to make dynamic 3D maps overlaid on digital terrain models; and the web-based GPS Visualizer (www.gpsvisualizer.com) to overlay tracks on hi-res satellite/aerial photos generate elevation profiles and generate kml or kmz files to load into Google Earth (download from earth.google.com Win 2000 XP OS X 10.3.9 and 10.4.x only).



I found the pins securing the wrist strap impossible to budge with a screwdriver as stated in the manual. I had to take it to a watch repair shop where the repairer used a "jeweler's band pin removing tool" -- with some careful effort -- to pop the pins in order to remove the wrist strap. So it seems you either leave the wrist strap on or off (or buy the jeweler's tool): it's too difficult to switch around.



Why is Garmin still stuck on serial port interfaces? USB has been around for a few years now and is much easier to deal with. It would also be friendlier if you didn't have to use the charger cradle in order to connect to a computer. The standard charger sold in the US is 120v only. It wouldn't have cost much more to design a universal 120-240v charger for worldwide use. Garmin's MSRP for their 240v version is an outrageous $32.90! (It can be found mail-order for around $20.)



The owner's manual is pretty minimal. It doesn't explain the elements of the Map Mode display. Perhaps it works well at walking/running speeds but on a bike I can't pay attention to the road and simultaneously focus on its tiny symbols. And on most rides the display is too small to cover the range of the entire route without the waypoints/auto lap points overlapping.



Once again we Mac (and Linux and even Win 95) users are ignored by a manufacturer when it comes to software support. The only way to update the firmware is with a Windows PC because the firmware is wrapped up inside a Windows-only "Updater" executable. On a Mac you can use a serial-to-USB adapter cable and Virtual PC running Windows 98 or later to update the firmware. You may have to install a Windows driver from the manufacturer of the adapter cable. In my case I also had to tell Virtual PC that COM1 was the "usbserial0" port on my Mac.



For Mac OS X I found a set of 3 shareware programs from HikeTech.com to be useful. They are: (1) Link2GPS for transferring waypoints to/from the GPS and downloading tracks from the GPS; (2) TopoDraw to display tracks as a 2-D map (you can even overlay tracks on digitized maps as long as you have at least 3 waypoints you can identify on the map to establish its scale and relationship to the track data); (3) gpswrite to chart altitude vs. distance speed vs. distance. The 3 programs work together using files in GPX format.



NEWER ALTERNATIVES (at higher prices of course): In 2006 Garmin has 2 newer lines of sports-oriented GPS units. The Forerunner 205 is a wristwatch unit with all the features of the 201 a smaller-but-higher resolution screen and more sensitive GPS circuitry and faster satellite sync. It comes with a 120v/60Hz charger only no international version. There's a model 305 which adds a heart-rate monitor. Another new series is the Edge aimed squarely at cyclists. The 205 is the basic model the 305 the higher-end one which adds cadence and/or HRM and a barometric altimeter. The Edge series has a larger grayscale screen better sensitivity and faster satellite sync and offers a 240v/50Hz charger as an optional accessory.More detail ...

GARMIN 100046700 FORERUNNER 305 GPS RECEIVER WITH HEART RATE MONITOR


Better than 405 & Polar...GOOGLE EARTH alone is worth the upgrade!!!5

I use mine for cycling and running the direct link to see your workouts mapped on GOOGLE EARTH is FANTASTIC!!!! (the included software is far more stable than the junk Polar included with their HRM's.



Heart rate strap with replaceable battery is coded and comfortable. It's better in my opinion than the Polar products (of which I've owned three)



This is much better than the Forerunner 201 which I previously owned (locks on satellites 10 times faster) and I'd avoid the 405 unless you really want to use this watch as a normal day to day wristwatch (check out the 405 reviews)



One nice feature is being able to customize the display screens. Another review criticized the 305 for the numbers being too small to read while exercising. I don't have an issue but would point out that you can significantly increase the size of the display by simply displaying fewer fields.



My only complaint is that it's easy to leave it on and run the battery down - which is a bummer if you're just about to work out. I wish there was an "auto off" feature which would shut it down if it detects no movement or heart rate within an hour or so. Fortunately with Li-Ion batteries as little as a 10 minute charge gives you enough juice for a 90 minute run.



If you've found this review to be helpful please let me know! More detail ...

Garmin 010-10889-01 Forerunner 305/205 Quick Release Bike Mount Replacement


Stop - read this before you buy this accessory2

Stop- This item is a replacement for the quick release bike mounting kit. It does NOT include the new wrist band for the watch. If you want full quick release capabilities you need to buy the KIT not the replacement bracket. Spend the extra $10it's worth itMore detail ...

Garmin Forerunner 305 GPS Receiver With Heart Rate Monitor (Bilingual)


Better than 405 & Polar...GOOGLE EARTH alone is worth the upgrade!!!5

I use mine for cycling and running the direct link to see your workouts mapped on GOOGLE EARTH is FANTASTIC!!!! (the included software is far more stable than the junk Polar included with their HRM's.



Heart rate strap with replaceable battery is coded and comfortable. It's better in my opinion than the Polar products (of which I've owned three)



This is much better than the Forerunner 201 which I previously owned (locks on satellites 10 times faster) and I'd avoid the 405 unless you really want to use this watch as a normal day to day wristwatch (check out the 405 reviews)



One nice feature is being able to customize the display screens. Another review criticized the 305 for the numbers being too small to read while exercising. I don't have an issue but would point out that you can significantly increase the size of the display by simply displaying fewer fields.



My only complaint is that it's easy to leave it on and run the battery down - which is a bummer if you're just about to work out. I wish there was an "auto off" feature which would shut it down if it detects no movement or heart rate within an hour or so. Fortunately with Li-Ion batteries as little as a 10 minute charge gives you enough juice for a 90 minute run.



If you've found this review to be helpful please let me know! More detail ...

Garmin 010-00679-25 Forerunner 50 with Heart Rate Monitor and Foot Pod


Great hardware Garmin Connect still developing4

I did a lot of research before purchasing and was down to the 305 405 and 50. I really wanted a GPS watch but the price of the Forerunner 50 with footpod and HR monitor couldn't be beat. I also liked the smaller watch and the fact that it didn't need to be charged.



After owning it a week:

I really like the watch. I don't typically wear them but it is very comfortable. It is only slightly larger than a typical watch and has a fine adjustment on the band. I'm wearing it all the time.



The hardware is impressive. The foot pod and HR monitor worked very well right out of the box and were comfortable to wear. They "paired" right away and were ready to go when I was ready to run. The ANT installation went as advertised on windows vista and the upload works automatically for Garmin Training Center but not Garmin Connect.



Possible improvements:

For the watch itself the number of "views" while in training mode can be confusing. I'm sure I'll get the hang of it with use or reading manual but it is clearly more than I'm used to.



Installation: The process seemed to drive you toward choosing either Garmin Training Center (software on your computer) or Garmin Connect (web sofware) but not both. I didn't know the pro/con of either so I wanted to try both. It was awkward when it wanted me to install ANT drivers again for the installation of the second one. I canceled the installation at that point - but found that Training Center was installed.



Software: It is really not clear to me if Garmin Training Center is still being developed. They seem to be improving Garmin Connect (web) regularly but at its current state it doesn't have any benefit over Training Center. (remember - I'm not seeing the GPS/maps so maybe there is distinction there). So after a week I still find myself bouncing back and forth. There are a few bugs in Garmin Connect and a few notable features that I would really like to see (that is available in other web training software).



Results:

I'm very happy with the HR monitor and cadence results. They seem spot on and reliable. I'm still working on the distance and pace. I did a test 3 mile run on a measured course and found that it recorded 3.1 miles. I messed up a calibration run by hitting the wrong button so I'll be trying that again (a subsequent 8 mile run was recorded as a 9 mile run... argghh). I've found that the instantaneous pace is not accurate but hope it will improve with calibration. Garmin Connect is also doing something weird with the average pace calculation... but I think that is a bug that will be fixed.



Overall I'm very happy with the purchase but hope they continue to improve the software. Currently that is the weakest link. If they don't there may be other sites that accept forerunner uploaded data to fill the gap. More detail ...